Green Energy Information

parliamentary information office: But you must remember we are saving the world. The fact that very few view countries believe this rubbish doesn't matter. It's like being in a huge hall with hundreds enjoying a smoke and one person called Britain decides to save everyone in the hall by stopping smoking, and he thinks he's right and everyone else is wrong.


parliamentary information office: Where's the democracy in all this? If I want to save a polar bear, I can give to the WWF, if I choose.


The point is that I have a choice whether or not to give to a charity. It is entirely voluntary. If I don't want to save a polar bear, I don't give to the WWF, as simple as that.


In this case, I have absolutely no choice. The government has said: you will be forced to pay to insulate other people's properties. You will do this to save the planet.


Where is the democracy in that? I don't believe for one moment that adding some loft, or cavity wall, insulation is going to save the planet, do you? However, there are other people that do believe in this stuff.


The solution is to make it voluntary, as with the polar bears. The people that want to save polar bears will be the people that will want to give generously towards this scheme.



Latest news updates at parliamentary information office.

LOVE YOUR LOCAL MARKET

Town and city regeneration will form part of a major feature on communities in the next edition of the Parliamentary Yearbook. Earlier this year we reported on the results of the Government’s competition to select 27 towns to become 'Portas Pilots’. Last Friday, 10th November 2012 Local Growth Minister Mark Prisk mp called on communities and budding entrepreneurs to back their local markets well into the New Year, as part of a wider effort to breathe new life into the nation's High Streets.

The Minister confirmed that the Love Your Local Market campaign in 2013 will take place from 15 May, and will give aspiring retailers the chance to test out their ideas at their local markets.

During the 'Love Your Local Market' campaign, new stallholders will be able to take advantage of a 'Table for a Tenner' deal - with some offering free pitches - at markets across the country, with many offering mentoring to those setting up shop for the first time.

And to make sure as many high streets as possible can take part, the National Association of British Markets Authorities will hold a series of roadshows sharing ideas that councils and other market operators can take to make their events a success.

Around 400 local markets across the country were involved this Summer, with a locally-defined programme of events designed to attract visitors into town centres and help new start-ups.

Mark Prisk said:

"Markets can play an integral role in reviving our high streets, offering something new and exciting for shoppers in a way the Internet and out-of-town retail centres can't.

"I would urge traders and councils across the country to back this effective and important campaign, offer support to budding entrepreneurs looking to trade and Love Your Local Markets."

Graham Wilson, OBE, Chief Executive of the National Association of British Market Authorities, said:

"Love Your Local Market and National Market Day provided a great impetus to the campaign to revitalise the High Street and created an opportunity for almost 2000 people to sample market trading for the first time. We now want to build on this success and make LYLM 2013 bigger and better."

Joe Harrison, Chief Executive of the National Market Traders' Federation, said:

"We, at the National Market Traders' Federation, are happy to see this campaign running again for a second year, and are delighted to support it. We do hope it has an even bigger impact than the first event with regard to the encouragement of new start-up businesses within the industry."

Following up on a successful fortnight

It follows the success of the Love Your Local Markets event in June this year, which saw over 400 markets run over the dedicated two weeks.

As a result of this scheme:

·         around 400 markets took part under the 'Love Your Local Markets' banner

·         just under 2,000 new traders joined local markets during last year's campaign

·         over 3,000 'Tables for a Tenner' and free pitches were offered - over half of which were taken up

·         Examples include

·         Sarah Rogers, whose chocolate stall is now a regular fixture at Ludlow Market, with visitors now looking to buy her products online and making bookings for her to cater weddings and other events

·         Obi Nwosu, who started selling during Love Your Local Market at Portobello in London, and now has stalls in six locations across the Capital

·         Keith Smith, who started his Natural Ingredients stall at Fleetwood Market earlier this year, but is now trading on every market day of the week, and sell into retail outlets including food halls and other local specialist markets

We shall be adding to the article as there are further developments. The full report will be published in print and online in the next edition of the Parliamentary Yearbook.

Web: www.parliamentaryyearbook.co.uk

Email: parliamentaryyearbook@blakemedia.org

Tea Sell Deal

parliamentary information office: An excellent idea, unfortunately there will no workers available to fill the orders, once Clegg brings in his flexi time.





parliamentary information office: Deal join more together for other future businesses.

parliamentary information office

Remembrance Day Information

parliamentary information office: It takes the biscuit when the likes of Baroness Warsi is wheeled out to spout unctuous tripe like this.

And quite frankly statements like :

 "That is a message that will rain on the parade of extremists: both the preachers of hate, who burn poppies as a vile protest against the West, and the far Right, who hijack the patriotism of Remembrance Sunday by trying suppress its messages of tolerance and freedom by making the event a divisive, whites-only moment."

Are totally unnecessary and inappropriate in the context of Remembrance Sunday. The Baroness and all her fellow travellers with chips on both shoulders should not be allowed to hijack the occasion to make their puerile points. There is a time and place for such comments and Remembrance Sunday is NOT that time.


parliamentary information office: Warsi's government completed what the German Army could not. The utter demoralisation of the British Armed Forces; who within one term of Cameron's catastrophic government have been hollowed out and would take at least a generation to correct, as the trust has gone.

We have slipped beneath the waves, thanks to the shallow analysis of airhead Dave and using defence funds to expand the vanity department of DFID for his erstwhile Rasputin, Mitchell.

The detoxification of the Tories was considered more important than national security and it still backfired when that  objectionable bully Mitchell showed his true colours.



parliamentary information office: "those who fought for our freedoms nearly a century ago."
Most if not all believed that is what they were fighting for, and they fought in terrible conditions with unstinting bravery and gallantry.
But nonetheless they were wastefully sacrificed for no useful purpose by the insane folly of politicians and generals.
That is what we should remember about the Great War while we commemorate the men who fought in it.
Especially when, as like here, dodgy politicians are still mouthing platitudes about 'our freedoms',



parliamentary information office: Calling an end to WW1 meant France, Britain and Germany would not go the way of Russia.  That is why the conflict, that should never have happened, ended.

My memories are of veterans, family and men alive and maimed 60 years after the event, living out their final years at the BLESMA home.

Was the war worth it, was it xyz.


parliamentary information office shares you more.

Human Rights Information

parliamentary information office: He means the European Law, and it is telling that even this sensible man assumes that the law of Europe is sovereign to the law of Britain: the will of parliament.

That can not be right.  Never.

He is right in the respect that members of the last government  signed a treaty that gave Europe supremacy over the British Government.  Traitors.

But he is wrong - because our government had no right to sign away our sovereignty to anybody.

Lease of all to a bunch of foreigners who have, for the last 400 years, tried to attack, invade and disadvantage us.

Dominic:  get your legal head off, get your sensible head on.  Understand that laws that do not have the assent of parliament must always be subordinate to those which do.

And if you can't grasp that, please stand aside for somebody who can.



parliamentary information office: What I hope this shower does stay in it is our only hope Labour nearly bancrupted us and mass immigration has made us a violent and scary country with no jobs, no housing, and our culture being changed. Aslo needed to remember id that Alister Darling on the last day of office before they were defeat by the Torys signed us up to bidding agreements that if we want to change it is illegal and have ven threated to sue us if we do not let all the EU members in that want to come without good English. So how the hell can they do all these things with the yoke of the EU around our necks thanks to the traitors called Labour .



parliamentary information office: The government might as well announce Human Rights are not the right thing for Britain, instead we are having the Wealthy Paedophiles Right To Privacy Act.

Nice work Cameron, we all saw what you were really saying when the muppet Schofield, who has gone up in my estimation by a mile, confronted you with that list of your chums.


parliamentary information office: What about the rights of the dead children at the care homes in Jersey and Wales,
 Phil Schofield did the right thing to put the tory Cameron on the spot about tory abusers as we may be talking about murder as well as abuse, the cult of Freemasonry must be exposed and the security service MI5 must have known what was going on!


Parliamentary Information Office for latest news and updates.

David Cameron congratulates Barack Obama on re-election victory

David Cameron congratulates Barack Obama on re-election victory

Prime Minister David Cameron his congratulations to Barack Obama, the US President re-elected for second term as has been referred to.

"I think he's a very successful American President and I look forward to working with him in the future," he said.

Labour leader Ed Miliband said that Mr Obama's win was a "fairer economy built on the make.

Mr Obama fought a tough challenge by Republican candidate Mitt Romney was seen off.

Speaking during a tour of the Middle East, the Prime Minister said: "I would like to congratulate Barack Obama on the great victory.
Business expected

"I really like working with him over the past few years and I work with him in the next four years to look forward to fun.

"There are so many things that we need to do: we need to kick start the world economy, and I would like to see an EU-US trade deal.
Continue reading the main story
"Starting bid

Great victory fairer economy and politics can do about optimism based on building "

Ed Miliband

Peston: US elections and UK plc
Robinson: lessons from Obama's victory

"Right here in Jordan I Barack want to talk about what one of the first things the inside stories about Syria's appalling how we try to resolve this crisis and will do more listening.

"Above all, congratulations Barack. I enjoyed working with him, I think he is a very successful American President and I look forward to working with him in the future."

Foreign Secretary William Hague said the move "on shared foreign policy goals" President Obama and his team had been looking to work with.

Mr Miliband offered his congratulations tweeting: "great victory of fairer economy and politics can do about creating optimism."

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg sought to draw a parallel with domestic politics, was "long memories" to voters of Mr. Obama's win showed suggesting when it came to who they believe were responsible for the current economic difficulties.

"When it comes to a vote, the voter who made the mess in the first place and that painstaking, and harder, longer-than-we-had-hope, that shit is working to clear the remember" Lib Dem leader-in Mr Cameron for Prime Minister's questions at-MPS.

Business cooperation and at the same time, Mr Clegg said that the United States and Europe closer together to work on dealing with the effects of climate change.
Economic challenges

There was a feeling across Europe he would be "more care, Mr. Romney would be more favorable to the rest of the world" since the Conservative MP John Redwood "fun" Mr. Obama's victory in the UK suggested.

But he said that the President is serious on its strategy and responding to the war in Afghanistan.

"Now matter how he heal the raw feelings of dissent in his country tries to do, and how the debt mountain and losses he has created to deal with," he wrote on his blog.

Conservative MP Rob Wilson said that result was the US elections Tuesday suggested "a tough four years.

"A country and Obama looks like he may be a lame duck President," he wrote on Twitter.

But Conservative colleague guy Opperman said that the "middle" ground were unable to defeat Mr. Romney has shown.

"Since they lurched to the right Mitt Romney clearly did not win," he told the BBC. "he was, to a certain degree, tea party, especially during the primary campaign had been taken and was not able to capture the middle ground.

"Because he couldn't find the middle ground and what 's, centre-right want a point of view most people can't capture it core support that he needs to win the election is lost."

Election Campaign Information

parliamentary information office: The truth in the Uk is that a lot of wealthy and more importantly the media and "celebs" are mostly Labour supporters. Why this is I am never quite sure, sometimes it seems that these people think that by trying to occupy the imagined moral high ground of, I care for the disadvantaged-asylum seekers-the poor-charity or whatever the popular fad of the moment is. So this continued "only the rich vote Tory is nonsense. A lot of normal working class people actually are more conservative thinking than thought. They hate mass uncontrolled immigration because they are the one's affected. They hate unlimited benefit payments because they live close to those who choose not to work and drag their neighbourhoods down with drugs and crime. They hate the vast bureacracy of the town hall, which spouts socialist dogma and employs hundreds and thousands of communication workers, equality advisers, outreach workers but won't empty their bins weekly

parliamentary information office: The American people have spoken, no to the privilaged class taking governance as a right, no to judging a man be his bank balance and no to allowing right wing politics to have the right to bigotry and intolerance. Whatever Romney is he got the thumbs down in a big way. He is cut from the same cloth as Cameron and Osborne they are political dinosaurs who believe their bank balance gives them the right to dictate how we live. Drivel jus like this article which was written expecting Obama to lose. Not much political insight there then.

parliamentary information office: all politicians use spin, rhetoric, dissembling and being economical with the truth to sway the electorate whilst working to fulfil their own ends, it is part of their stock-in-trade.


parliamentary information office: "On Monday, he was given something approaching a hero’s welcome at Islington Town Hall, where he promoted the living wage paid by some local authorities and by private contractors prepared to offer the higher rate in order to secure lucrative deals to run leisure centres, parks and school dinners." So, a de facto 15-25% rise in the minimum wage, not voted for by parliament and paid for by council tax payers (where local authority staff are directly involved) or strong armed out of private employers by union goons in return for local authority contracts and thus paid for by............council tax payers.



Legitimate Parliamentary Information Office resources get you more about business and politics.

More children should be in care, say MPs

More children should be in care, say MPs

In England, a Committee of MPs investigating child protection and children at risk should be taken into consideration.

They often frustrate parents the benefit of the doubt, which then fail to improve father that warned.

The MP also said that especially vulnerable youth care system was abandoned as inadequate support for older children.

The Government said that any "unacceptable," "a big improvement the middle way was through the system" of abuse.

House of Commons education Select Committee, warned that too many children, "the long neglected" chronic conditions were being left.

MPs were often their parents made many changes to their children's chances are left without the assistance and protection needs of the expense.
Image of care

A family from a neglected baby early, there was a child with family leave report in practice, rather than community service found an idea too much.

These parents, who have alcohol or drug abuse is often "many years of support, rather than direct intervention were faced by the monitor with its own problems, maybe.

Committee member, Ian Mearns, said: "that is not much of a difference can a family of an ever-growing awareness."
Continue reading the main story
"The initial bidding

Whatever your views in our society, children and the most vulnerable people to cut the price to pay for not exploit "

Graham Stuart education Standing Committee

Child care services, except a violent or destructive home to install and more positive results could give a more positive image.

With Jimmy Savile and scandals around high-profile cases all famous educationist, young people have to worry about abuse.

And older children who are vulnerable to violent behavior of them adults can leave provision raises concerns about.

"Not good enough for older children feel that they too often ignore, demean or care not to be heard from our youth and pushed out insufficient preparation and supported by Mr. Stuart said.

While the most vulnerable children, care homes, such as often leave at least that support, better cross-party group of MPs-off family in their twenties and beyond continue to provide aid to argument.

"Children, who are most damaged some time ago, parenting" MPs reported.

Mr Mearns said that when "kids" system care and after looking at the age of 16 was pushed out to himself, "if something goes wrong is a surprise that it should be".

Support services for older children to take care of the expansion of the financial cost, was recognized.

And they warned should not fall quickly is the ability to intervene in troubled families to put pressure on local authorities.

Mr Stuart said a false "economy" interventions and problems get worse.

"Major improvements"

"Whatever the price paid to children and the most vulnerable people in our society on the exploitation of the cut are not necessary," he said.

Whether it relates to a child from a family-and pressure David Simmonds budget echoed, local Government Association's children and young people Board President hard to balance.

"Protecting vulnerable children jobs councils and social worker every day when a baby is about to be away from her family and are incredibly hard to make sure one of the most important tasks.

"Councils to stop down the line and the importance of early intervention to understand problems and to invest in it.

"But to make tough decisions, the Committee rightly points out the current financial climate Councils spend the most, as being forced to take."

A plant as education spokesman, said: "it is unacceptable for teens to abuse or neglect. children should be protected from harm, whatever your age.

"The Committee notes that every child gets help when they need it child protection system in Central-Government through a major improvement as they should.

"Education Committee, which has raised a number of important issues by careful consideration of the needs and issues a full public response is supposed to provide."

You have been impacted by the issues raised in the story? If you please over BBC radio and TV to be interviewed on the bottom of the form for you.

Music Festival

parliamentary information office: You think that's bad, here in this country we protect racist Muslim rapists, and our media covers up their crimes saying that despite the fact they are all Asian  and their victims all white, there is no racial element!! 

And then you have foreign terrorists who wish to blow us up, and what do we do?  No, we don't hang them as an example.  We give them a house, ask them if they want their family over, give them money, and pay for some fancy lawyer (Tony Blairs wife perhaps?) to argue their case for them.

But Woe betide a white referee who may have "hurt" someones "feelings" for using a "nasty" word.

That is far worse crime than all the above.


They should be hung for treason.

And any "black" association completely disbanded for prejudice and any members prosecuted for being racist. How is having a "black lawyers association" or a "black police association" not racist? Seriously...

And as for the police. Don't even get me started on that shower of shite.

It's about time common sense prevailed. Otherwise fury and anger will take it's place. And then there will be chance for reasoned debates, and no amount of beard scratching by the Guardian readers will help, and the "community inclusion executive" that are favoured by mostly left wing marxist local governments will have their work cut out for them.

What is happening is the seeds of war are being sown.

History tells us such. And history has a tendency to repeat itself.

Either the elephant in the room is acknowledged, or it proceeds to tear the whole house down.

  

parliamentary information office: We spent 750 million pounds on that god awful Millennium Dome rubbish, and recently we blew several hundred billion on banks, not to mention those pesky wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (remember those?).

The national government's largesse with public money on nonsensical cultural projects, other people's wars, and to keep the old boys network in the black makes the EU look like a bunch of skinflint Calvinists on a bible study weekend.


parliamentary information office: The sad truth is that what appears on one side of the Union as loose financial discipline, pilfering, or even fraud, is perceived in other countries of the same Union as a far, almost unattainable ideal of financial discipline. There are countries where the EU does not only bring funds, but also rules for spending them that go a long way towards achieving a higher level of care for the public money than the locals would ever dream of. This remark should not in any way be interpreted as  supportive of the snafu's reported in this article.


parliamentary information office: I was in Swansea recently and in the super new Bus Station a message is constantly displayed that it was built with funds from the Welsh Government and the EU.  No mention of the fact that the money originated from the whole of the UK and was given in the first place to Brussels and Cardiff by Westminster, and that only a fraction comes back on grants.  This is how the EU works.  Belittle the national Governments, after taking their money, and write them out of history.  Instead create the illusion that it is the local nationalistic "county council on stilts" that provides the largesse, together with Brussels.  You don't have to be Einstein to work out the EU's agenda here.



Parliamentary information office - bridge between people and Parliament also spreading the significant parliament information.

Public Views on Expenses Scandals

parliamentary information office: After all the pathetic excuses given by numerous MPs for claiming expenses, that they should clearly have known they were not entitled to. MPs from all parties are still fiddling their expenses.

It should be law that any MP found fiddling expense claims should immediately be expelled and lose parliamentary privileged cover and be charged with theft.

What most people want to know is - why have MPs been permitted to get away with fiddling their expenses by traveling first class when they should have traveled second class.

This was / is a clear breach of the rules, which state that you can ONLY travel first class when it is cheaper than second class.

At the time of booking their first class tickets it was / is ALWAYS cheaper to book second class. But they have deliberately chosen to compare it with last minute ticket price which for both first AND second class is dearer.

Why then is it that no action has been taken against these MPs ?

Why have none of the party leaders not thrown them out ?

They should lose their seat and be treated just the same as other employees and be charged for blatant theft.




parliamentary information office: Someone who heckles Cameron gets 100 hours community service but a thieving MP in a position of trust is able to resign. People wouldn't believe you if you made it up.


parliamentary information office: Obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception, or conspiracy thereto. That would do for a start.

Why is that all the convicted MP's belong to the Labour Party?



parliamentary information office: The former Europe minister said he wanted to take responsibility for his mistakes.
The Standards and Privileges Committee said he "plainly planned to deceive"

Well, I guess a criminal offence by an elected MP can only be a minor mishap, mistake or pure bad luck.

How many years is he (and the rest) going to serve at her majesty's pleasure?

Parliamentary Yearbook - parliamentary information office

Live Parliament News

parliamentary information office: Claims that the private IT firm Atos made misleading statements about proposed co-operation with disability groups to help secure a £400m contract to perform disability assessments must be immediately investigated, Labour and several disability charities have demanded.

Leaked information from the tendering documents reveal that the firm said it would work with a number of disability organisations to carry out eligibility tests for a new disability benefit.

Four of the organisations named in the document said they had no contact with Atos before being named as possible partners and strongly objected to any suggestion that they planned to co-operate with the company.



parliamentary information office: A foreign secretary walked into a taxidermist with an anaconda and £10 grand, ''Why have you brought him here ?'' asked the taxidermist. "Well he's already been to the pictures and the pub, I thought the change would do him good" replied 14 pint Bill.



parliamentary information office: I read this, it's lengthy but well researched but I found it to be very revealing, someone has taken the time to hold a mirror up to the Conservative party. Spurred by this article, I had a look at other articles and some of the revelations although not exactly new news, when placed together they make for alarming reading about this government and the Conservative party. I'll be going back to read some more of this hard hitting stuff, someone knows how to cut through the mishmash of this terrible government, that's for sure!


parliamentary information office: I wonder who the guest will be, probably a right winger, this is what the BBC do lately put three right wingers against two left. However, these two particular lefties are more than a match for Williams and Moore, they will be eaten alive. I wish I was part of the audience I would love to ask Shirley Williams why she decided to betray every single person in this country when she voted with the Tories (albeit after a bit of grandstanding and public hand wringing) to destroy, break up and privatise our NHS, I can tell you I wouldn't be letting her get away with the mealy mouth excuses for answers! She and the Liberal Democrats will never be forgiven for this and yet, and yet they still do not realise it!

Latest News

Debate for Wind Farms

parliamentary information office

what do you suggest replacing them with ? coal plants  cause acid rain unless you mine and transport limestone and are a noticeable blot on the landscape and coal mines are a dirty dark and dangerous place to work and open cast mines are a huge scar.

or we can have nuclear powerplants which are a massive intrusion create much pollution through all the steel and concrete that is required to build them and have nuclear waste which is deadly to man for thousands of years which has to be disposed and monitored securely. also remember fukushima three mile island and of course chernobyl. they also cost billions to decommission.

or we could cover the countryside with fracking rigs which have been shown to cause minor earthquakes and possibly contaminate the water supply with the dangherous chemicals used to push the gas out.

or we can use gas and oil  which are mainly sourced from the middle east and russia amongst other areas and we dont know how reliable these sources are or how long the supply will last or be available. you also need pipelines, tankers and refineries and resulting pollution such as the exxon valden torrie canyon and the rig in the us gulf. and of course the north sea is full of rigs so i dont see the difference between that and a wind farm which harnesses free and non polluting energy.


parliamentary information office

The argument for wind farm follies was lost yonks ago when the real figures became known, something a seasoned cynic like myself has been banging on about for just about as long as these ruddy awful eyesores were first installed on the landscape.

parliamentary information office

It's simply an obsticle to addressing the important issues which continually get kicked down the road.

Nobody will take tough decisions because they dont win votes and being in power is everything


parliamentary information office

Just withdraw the subsidies for building them AND refuse to pay a penny more than the current cost of generating electricity by conventional methods...
problem solved, because no one will erect a wind turbine other
than some farmer living in an area which has no normal supply.
Same principle should apply to solar power...install your panels for your personal use...no resale of surplus to energy companies at silly prices. Then no 'profit' will accrue. It is so simple


More Parliamentary News